Friday, February 26, 2016 | 9:00 AM – 12:00 PM
Greenberg Lounge, Vanderbilt Hall
This symposium will focus on the recent Supreme Court decision, Horne v. United States Department of Agriculture. Horne altered American agricultural policy and unified Takings jurisprudence by recognizing protections for personal property as well as real property. What exactly this means, especially for New Deal-era regulations and broader agricultural law, is unclear. Horne‘s impact also extends past the agricultural cases and can cover land use, intellectual property and financial arrangements. This conference seeks to analyze Horne from both positive and normative perspectives.
To register online, please click here or copy and paste the following link into your browser:
https://nyu.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_40IOTGPDn70yB25
The conference will consist of two panels, which will focus on (1) the implications of the decision for Takings law and (2) the impact on American agricultural policy and agri-business. Participants include Karen Bradshaw Schulz, Arizona State University; Steven Eagle, George Mason University School of Law; Richard Epstein, NYU School of Law; Clayton Gillette, NYU School of Law; Roderick Hills Jr., NYU School of Law; Dean Lueck, University of Arizona; Stephen Schwartz, Cause of Action; and Aaron Simowitz, NYU School of Law.
This symposium is jointly sponsored by the NYU Journal of Law & Liberty, the Classical Liberal Institute, and the New York University School of Law,